Bank vs NBFC Education Loan: Which Is Better?

When financing higher education in India or abroad, students often compare bank vs NBFC education loan options to find the right balance between interest rates, eligibility, processing time, collateral requirements, and repayment flexibility. Where banks might give you competitive rates, they might also have stricter qualifying criteria. Non-banking financial companies (NBFC), on the other hand, could give you faster service and a more flexible choice for unsecured loans at competitive rates. Learning the differences will help you select the right education loan for your needs.

Find The Best Loan for YOU!

What is a bank education loan?

A bank‑education loan is offered by a scheduled bank (public sector, private sector) under formal banking regulation (for example, the lender must abide by the guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for education loans). Key characteristics:

• They may offer lower benchmark interest rates because banks have access to low‑cost deposit funding.
• They often have strict course/institute lists (for eligibility) especially for study abroad loans.
• They may require collateral/security depending on the amount and destination.
• Processing may be slower as banks follow larger compliance and legacy systems.

What is an NBFC education loan?

An NBFC is a non‑banking finance company: it cannot accept demand deposits like a bank, but it can lend and fund student education loans. For students looking to study abroad or in less‑traditional destinations, NBFCs may offer flexibility. Features:

• More flexible on institute/course lists, often tailored to study‐abroad or niche destinations.
• Potentially faster processing and customized features (moratorium options, step‑up EMIs, etc).
• Interest rates may be higher (given higher risk or absence of cheap deposit funding) and terms slightly less standardized.
• Collateral/margin money requirements may be less rigid (or higher) depending on the profile.

Key Differences

Interest Rates and Fees

Interest rates vary considerably across the two groups, and it is incorrect to assume that all banks have the same benchmark. With regard to the current cycle, according to the interest rate sheets of individual banks:

• State Bank of India (public bank): Its Global Ed-Vantage program for loans for study abroad has released interest rates that have been in the vicinity of 8.65% to 11.5%. Interest rates have typically been pegged to SBI’s own rate of lending. An interest concession of 0.50% is offered to female applicants.
• ICICI Bank (private bank): publishes education loan rates linked to the RBI Repo Rate plus a spread (an External Benchmark Lending Rate, or EBLR, approach), with recently published secured-loan rates starting around 8.50% to 9.00% and unsecured study-abroad rates starting around 10.25%, according to ICICI’s own rates page. This is a different benchmark structure than SBI’s, which is part of why it’s inaccurate to say “banks use MCLR” as a blanket statement.
• Avanse Financial Services (NBFC): calculates its rate as its own Avanse finance education loans Base Rate plus a floating spread based on credit and course profiling, with a published range broadly between 10% and 16.5% depending on the applicant’s profile, per Avanse’s official site.
• Credila (NBFC, formerly HDFC Credila): publishes floating rates starting from roughly 8.95% to 9.95% for strong-profile, collateral-backed loans on its official rates page, with unsecured loans available up to a stated ceiling for qualifying applicants.

All figures above are current as of the lenders’ latest published pages at the time of writing and are subject to change. Always verify the live rate directly on the lender’s official website before applying, since these are revised periodically.

Eligibility Requirements

Education loan for abroad eligibility, is measured on the basis of a variety of factors, including academic performance, confirmed/conditional admission, recognition of courses/institutions, co-applicant’s strength (if any), and, in some cases, collateral value. Neither banks nor NBFCs rely upon a standardized check list. The differences in practice:

• Institution approval. Rather than basing institution approval on a limited list of names of institutions, banks normally look into course and institution recognition. Some of the NBFCs have approved institution lists, which, however, are not universal but lender-specific (Avanse claims coverage of dozens of countries, for example).
• Academic thresholds. Neither of the two types of lenders applies a fixed academic standard percentage; this varies from one lender to another, as well as from one course and destination to another.
• Co-applicant expectations. The requirement of having a co-applicant in most of the banks’ products is standard and refers mainly to the parents/guardians.

Secured and Unsecured Loans

Both banks and NBFCs offer secured (collateral-backed) and unsecured (collateral-free) products, so it’s inaccurate to associate one loan structure exclusively with one lender category.

• Banks: under the framework of the IBA Model Education Loan Scheme, loans up to about ₹7.5 lakh are commonly obtainable without collateral (commonly insured by the Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme for Education Loans scheme of the government), while loans above that are usually obtainable only with collateral equivalent to the loan amount. There have been some recent innovations in some banks in offering higher unsecured limit for admission into some prestigious or listed universities, such as SBI’s unsecured limit of ₹50 lakh without any collateral offered under its Global Ed-Vantage Scheme.
• NBFCs: some NBFCs provide significantly higher unsecured limits than what banks consider their benchmark. Credila’s official website gives details of unsecured loans that can be availed up to a certain higher limit based on the profile of the borrower, while Avanse provides both secured and unsecured education loans depending on the borrower’s profile and course selected. Education loan eligibility without collateral at this level generally depends more heavily on academic profile, university/course recognition, and co-applicant strength, since there’s no asset backing the loan.

Whether you should go for a secured or an unsecured loan will depend on how much you need in the loan, whether there is acceptable collateral that you can put up, and how much of a rate differential you can afford to pay if you don’t pledge any assets.

Co-Applicant Requirements

Most bank and NBFC products require a co-applicant, generally a parent, guardian, or close relative, whose income, existing liabilities, and credit history are assessed alongside the student’s own profile. A few points worth clarifying:

• Income requirements aren’t governed by one universal minimum; lenders assess income together with existing financial obligations and repayment capacity, and this differs by lender.
• Credit history checks (commonly via CIBIL score) are more consistently emphasized by banks and several NBFCs, though the specific minimum score, where a lender applies one, isn’t standardised across the industry.
• Some NBFCs and certain specific products offer more flexibility on who can serve as a co-applicant (extending beyond parents to other close relatives), but this is lender- and product-specific, not a general NBFC-wide rule.
• A smaller category of international, no-cosigner lenders exists outside the bank/NBFC comparison entirely, evaluating students on future earning potential instead of a co-applicant, but this article focuses specifically on the Indian bank versus NBFC comparison.

Processing and Disbursement

Processing times are among the most common generalizations made in comparing loans, and therefore it makes sense to be clear on the matter.

Both banks and NBFCs cannot provide a certain number of days for every application since processing time will depend on factors such as completeness of documents, need for valuation of collateral, and verification of co-applicants. However, the following can be stated without much trouble:

• Loans that have collateral valuation take longer to process than loans without collateral, not due to the fact that NBFCs or banks are slow but due to the added verification procedure.
• A number of NBFCs are known to provide eligibility assessments prior to the admission procedure along with doorstep delivery of documents.
• Some banks also now offer pre-admission or pre-visa sanction letters (SBI’s Global Ed-Vantage scheme, for example, is described on the bank’s own materials as available even before a final visa confirmation), so this isn’t an NBFC-exclusive feature either.
• Disbursement, for both categories, is typically staged: tuition is usually paid directly to the university per its own fee schedule, while living expenses are often released in tranches rather than as a lump sum.

Consider anything like “X days processing time” mentioned by banks or any NBFCs as estimates for a full and straightforward process, and not a guarantee because lack of documents or collateral may lengthen it by quite a few days.

Moratorium and Repayment

Most education loans offered by banks and NBFCs have a moratorium period wherein EMI payments need not be made in full.

The period usually encompasses the time span of the course and the subsequent grace period (usually up to six or twelve months after the course period or a shorter period after securing employment). A couple of points worth verification before jumping to conclusions:

• Whether quoted repayment tenure includes or excludes the moratorium period. Lenders present this differently, so a “15-year repayment tenure” can mean different things depending on how the moratorium is counted.
• Whether interest accrues during the moratorium. Simple interest is still charged by most banks on their loans, despite the fact that EMI payments are not required at this stage, while some even provide for a partial payment of interest facility during studies.
• Prepayment terms. Several lenders across both categories now advertise no prepayment penalty, but this varies by product and should be confirmed directly.
• Tax benefit eligibility. Interest paid on an education loan can potentially be claimed as a deduction under Section 129 of the Income Tax Act, 2025 (the provision previously known as Section 80E under the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the renumbering that took effect from Tax Year 2026-27), for up to 8 years from the year repayment of interest begins, with no upper limit on the deducted amount, according to official tax-guidance sources.

This deduction is generally only available under the old tax regime, not the new one, and only applies to loans taken from a lender that qualifies as a “financial institution” under the relevant provision, which includes banks and specific RBI-notified NBFCs.

Advantages and Limitations

Banks, generally:

• Benefit a lot from transparency regarding RBI-linked or repo-linked interest rates (especially private banks which follow the External Benchmark Lending Rate system).
• In case of public sector banks provide educational loans for abroad, which follow the scheme recommended by the IBA, the collateral and loan-tier system is standardized and therefore more comparable.
• Collateral verification and full documentation requirements can add time for larger, secured loans.
• Some bank products historically had lower unsecured limits than certain NBFCs, though this gap has narrowed with newer schemes at some banks.

NBFCs, generally:

• Often offer higher unsecured loan limits and more flexible collateral requirements for larger amounts, depending on the specific lender and applicant profile.
• Can offer broader university and country coverage under their own approved lists, though this varies by NBFC.
• Interest rates can run higher than the lowest bank rates, particularly for applicants without a strong co-applicant profile.
• Not every NBFC loan automatically qualifies for the same tax treatment as a bank loan; this needs lender-specific confirmation.

Which Works Best for You? Decision Factors to Weigh

A few realistic scenarios, though your actual best option still depends on comparing real offers:

• You have strong collateral and a co-applicant with solid income, and you’re prioritising the lowest possible rate: a bank loan, particularly a collateral-backed one under the IBA framework or a repo-linked private bank product, is often worth comparing first.
• You need a larger unsecured loan and don’t have collateral to offer: an NBFC offering higher unsecured limits may be more accessible, though expect a somewhat higher rate to offset the lack of security.
• You’re applying for a competitive student loan for masters abroad at a well-known university and want a pre-admission sanction letter to strengthen your visa application: both several banks and several NBFCs now offer this, so compare specific product features rather than assuming only one category provides it.
• You’re unsure which lender will actually approve your specific profile: Rather than guessing, it is better to have an organized comparison within both groups because eligibility is dependent on individual circumstances that are not easy to predict based on general claims in the marketing campaign.

ENQUIRE NOW

How Nomad Credit Helps You Decide

Since interest rates, collateral values, co-applicants, and tax benefits are dependent on the lenders and are subject to changes with little prior notice, doing a comparison between a bank and NBFC loan yourself would not only be difficult but also inaccurate. Ultimately, compare both options with the help of study abroad consultants, considering interest rates, moratorium, repayment flexibility, processing time, and coverage, before you commit.

Nomad Credit assesses your personal profile, college, program, co-applicants, and available collateral against the present offers from Indian banks and NBFCs and helps you find out which lenders would really be able to provide loans to you based on your profile. Contact Nomad Credit to compare your own bank and NBFC offers before applying. 

Loan Finder

Find Your Best Loan
Options in Minutes

Explore Offers Now